Science, Sceptics, and the Spirit World – Why We Need Each Other More Than We Think
Science, sceptics, and the spirit world – why we need each other more than we think by Kristian von Sponneck, Psychic Medium & Psychic Entertainer
Mediumship and science have circled each other for more than a century, like two sides of the same mystery that refuse to shake hands. 
Sceptics accuse mediums of delusion; mediums accuse sceptics of arrogance.
Both are partly right — and both are missing something vital.
If the goal is truth, not territory, then it’s time for a ceasefire.
Because the future of credible mediumship may depend on our willingness to invite science to the séance table.
We’ve Been Fighting the Wrong Battle
For generations, Spiritualists treated sceptics as enemies. The narrative was simple: “They want to destroy faith.”
But in reality, most researchers and rationalists simply want evidence that stands up to scrutiny.
That’s not persecution; that’s due diligence.
A scientist’s scepticism isn’t hostility — it’s curiosity with discipline. It asks the questions we sometimes avoid.
The real enemy of mediumship isn’t science; it’s dishonesty.
Science Without Spirit Is Cold — Spirit Without Science Is Chaos
Science gives us measurement, repeatability, and reason. Spirit gives us meaning, emotion, and connection.
Without science, belief becomes superstition.
Without spirit, science becomes mechanism.
Both are incomplete without the other. The universe itself is evidence that physics and consciousness are intertwined; we just haven’t learned to read the code yet.
Mediumship, when done ethically, is the bridge between those languages.
The Fear of Testing
Many mediums shy away from scientific study. They fear failure, exposure, or reductionism — as though a laboratory could “trap” Spirit in data.
But if our experiences are genuine, they can withstand examination.
A failed experiment doesn’t disprove Spirit; it highlights variables we don’t yet understand. You can only test what ‘comes through’, but with this in mind and easily said, personally, testing I would never swerve. Imagine how much credibility we’d gain if mediums volunteered for transparent testing, recorded their sessions, and worked alongside parapsychologists instead of against them.
The more light we allow in, the fewer shadows sceptics can point to.
The Psychology of Protection
There’s also ego at play. Some mediums secretly rely on mystery for authority. They fear that if science explains the mechanism, the magic will vanish.
But truth doesn’t destroy wonder — it refines it.
Knowing how light refracts doesn’t make a rainbow less beautiful; it makes it more miraculous.
If we truly believe Spirit is real, we shouldn’t fear discovery; we should crave it.
Sceptics Need to Evolve Too
Respect goes both ways. Some sceptics enter the discussion already convinced that all psychic phenomena are fraud. That’s not science; that’s bias.
A real scientist observes without contempt. A true investigator tests with empathy as well as method.
Scepticism should question the data, not insult the experiencer.
When sceptics start listening instead of labelling, and mediums start measuring instead of defending, genuine progress can happen.
The Shared Language of Consciousness
Both camps are exploring the same mystery from opposite directions: what happens to consciousness when the body dies?
Neuroscientists map brain waves during near-death experiences.
Mediums describe communication with minds that no longer occupy bodies.
Maybe those aren’t conflicting claims but parallel research — two paths up the same mountain.
If we’d compare notes instead of throwing stones, we might finally see the summit.
How the Partnership Could Work
Open Demonstrations: Mediums willing to work under controlled, filmed conditions with independent observers.
Data Logging: Standardised forms recording statements, confirmations, and specific evidence.
Blind Readings: Mediums reading for sitters they can’t see or hear, eliminating sensory clues.
Peer Review: Both believers and sceptics analysing outcomes together, publicly.
Transparency benefits everyone. It doesn’t threaten Spirit; it proves sincerity.
Why Scepticism Is Healthy for the Soul
Scepticism keeps faith honest. It trims the overgrowth of fantasy and grounds the work in reality.
Without scepticism, mediumship turns into mythology.
With it, we grow sharper, clearer, and stronger.
Spirit doesn’t need blind belief — it needs informed trust.
The Role of Entertainment
As a Psychic Entertainer, I live on the boundary between art and spirituality.
Entertainment allows the public to experience curiosity safely; science ensures that curiosity isn’t abused.
Both are valid entry points into mystery.
The trick is balance: educate through fascination, not fabrication.
A New Era of Collaboration
Imagine conferences where mediums and neuroscientists share data.
Imagine laboratories that test psychic perception without ridicule.
Imagine television shows that document evidence responsibly instead of exploiting grief.
That’s not fantasy — it’s the next evolution of spiritual research, if we have the courage to work together.
Science, Sceptics, and the Spirit World – Final Thoughts
Mediumship doesn’t need protection from science. It needs partnership with it.
The sceptic’s microscope and the medium’s sensitivity are two tools designed to examine the same truth.
The moment we stop defending our corners and start sharing our findings, both worlds will move closer to understanding the same eternal question: what happens when we die?
Until then, the bravest act a medium can take isn’t to convert the sceptic — it’s to welcome the test.
Because truth doesn’t fear measurement; only falsehood does.
You may like my last post, click the following to read How Ethical Mediums Can Heal the Damage Done to the Industry
Science, Sceptics, and the Spirit World








